Arizonans Should Protect Their Wallets and Our State’s Economy by Voting Yes on Prop 132

Arizonans Should Protect Their Wallets and Our State’s Economy by Voting Yes on Prop 132

It seems nowadays, the only ones who want to raise taxes are the government and far-left elites. That shouldn’t come as a big surprise. They’ll do whatever it takes to further their radical agenda—especially when their bank accounts go unaffected. But in a country that’s supposed to be governed by representation, too many tax increases in America—including right here in Arizona—are coming down to a simple majority.

Of course, we just saw this at the federal level when the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” passed on a 51-50 vote in the Senate thanks, in large part, to Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema. Now, because of the slimmest majorities along party lines, taxpayers are left with a $700 billion repackaged version of President Biden’s Build Back Broke plan.

But this issue isn’t limited to the federal government, Congress, or even state legislatures. Just look at what happened with Prop 208 in 2020. This disastrous piece of legislation, which was pushed by out-of-state special interest groups, passed with only 51% of people voting for it. And it would’ve turned Arizona into a high tax state had it not been for the court system killing it once and for all.

Allowing 51% of the population (who probably don’t have to pay the tax increase) to vote to tax the other 49% to pay it, is wrong. And while today’s tax increase may not affect you, tomorrow’s most certainly will.

That’s why it’s critical that the people of Arizona vote YES on Proposition 132.  

Introduced as HCR2015 by Rep. Tim Dunn (R-LD13), Prop 132 would require a 60% majority vote of the people on any ballot measure that wants to raise your taxes. Requiring broader support like this puts a check on out-of-state special interests who want to increase Arizona’s taxes to fund their schemes. This already happens in our state legislature where any tax increase requires a super majority. It’s only fair that voters have the same safeguard at the ballot box. We’re a representative government, and if we are asking Arizonans to part with more of their paycheck, it needs to be for something that has broad agreement from every part of the state.

After all, the reality is that at some point, you will be on the wrong end of a close vote. You will be in the minority. Crafting tax policy at the ballot box in this manner only creates class warfare and a tax code of winners and losers.

But it’s not even just about your wallet. These policies harm Arizona’s economy too. Thankfully, we avoided the Prop 208 tax that would have crushed small businesses in our state. But there will be more efforts like it to turn Arizona into a high-tax state like New York or California—the latter having driven away thousands of businesses from the state because of its taxes. In fact, California’s taxes and woke policies got so bad, the state actually ran out of one-way U-hauls!

This isn’t what the people of Arizona want. And it’s not what the people of Arizona deserve. Now, you have the opportunity to make your voice heard. Protect your wallet, and protect Arizona’s economy this November. VOTE YES on Proposition 132.

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.

The Russiagate Hoax Lawyer’s Lawsuit Against Voter Roll Maintenance Actually Makes the Case for Why We Need It

The Russiagate Hoax Lawyer’s Lawsuit Against Voter Roll Maintenance Actually Makes the Case for Why We Need It

We have always known that the left is strongly opposed to election integrity. In their hearts, they want voting to resemble how they select the best performers on American Idol—no security, no ID, no paper ballots, and no concern if someone decides to vote a few extra times.

Usually though, the left is pretty good at not saying this out loud. They couch their desires as supporting “voter access” or “expanded voting rights.” Very rarely do they reveal their true intentions of supporting open fraud in the system—yet they have now. And in open court no less.

Earlier this week, Russiagate hoax lawyer Marc Elias (Hillary Clinton’s old consigliere) filed a lawsuit challenging SB1260. Sponsored by Senator J.D. Mesnard, SB1260 is a simple but critical election integrity measure to prevent duplicate voter registrations. It requires county recorders to cancel the registrations of individuals who have since moved to and registered to vote in another county or state. For example, if you live and are registered to vote in Yavapai County, and then move to and register to vote in Maricopa County, SB1260 requires the Yavapai County Recorder to cancel your old registration.

Unsurprisingly, as with all commonsense measures that make it easy to vote and hard to cheat, Elias took issue with it. Not because, as they assert in other cases, the bill is unnecessary and there isn’t a problem with voter rolls. No, to the contrary, they admit that “having multiple registrations is legal and common.”

That’s not just one line in their lawsuit. It’s a central part of their argument. They reiterate it several times throughout their complaint, arguing that “to be registered to vote in more than one state or in more than one county in Arizona” is “quite common.”

Interestingly, they then make the argument, as they do in their challenges to the other election integrity measures, that SB1260 is not justified by any legitimate state interest. But the Elias lawyers themselves are arguing the state interest: the fact that it is “quite common” for someone to be a registered voter in multiple counties and states at any given time.

Even further, their argument in this case justifies the legitimate state interest of another Arizona election integrity measure, HB2243, that they have dragged into court. HB2243 revived a bill that had been vetoed by Governor Ducey, HB2617, which was sponsored by Representative Joseph Chaplik to ensure we have comprehensive and routine voter roll maintenance requirements to ensure only eligible voters are on our rolls.

Why is HB2243 necessary? We’ll let the Elias lawyers answer that in their suit against SB1260:

“People do not ordinarily think to affirmatively cancel their voter registration when they move, and there often is no obvious or easy way to do so. Nor is there any assurance that a jurisdiction will actually cancel a voter’s registration immediately upon receiving a request.”

Their argument in opposition to the new law is precisely why the law is needed! Having accurate voter rolls is imperative to conducting an election with integrity in which the electorate has confidence. Inaccurate voter rolls lead to ballots being sent to people who no longer live here, reducing confidence and creating the opportunity for bad actors to commit fraud.

And although, as the Elias lawyers argue, inaccurate voter rolls are often because of forgetfulness on behalf of voters who move from one state to another without thinking about cancelling their registration, this new lawsuit outlines exactly why bills like SB1260 and HB2243 were two of the most important pieces of election integrity legislation to pass this year, and exactly why voter roll maintenance is the first step in securing our elections.

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.

Arizona Free Enterprise Club Releases Next Round of Endorsements

Arizona Free Enterprise Club Releases Next Round of Endorsements

Phoenix, AZ – Today the Arizona Free Enterprise Club announced their first slate of General Election endorsements for 2022.

The endorsed individuals align with the organization’s principles and key policy goals. Club President Scot Mussi stated, “It is a critical time in our country and in our state. We need fighters who will take on the Left’s agenda that is crippling our economy, harming our children, and infringing on our Constitutional rights. These Club endorsed individuals will do just that. We encourage voters to support these candidates who will defend free market principles, advance conservative values, protect our border, and combat federal overreach here in Arizona and in Washington, D.C. This slate of candidates has proven they can and will.”

Statewide

Governor
Kari Lake
 
Secretary of StateAttorney General
Mark FinchemAbe Hamadeh
 
Superintendent of Public InstructionCorporation Commission
Tom HorneNick Myers
Kevin Thompson

Federal

U.S. Senate
Blake Masters
 
CD 1CD 2CD 4
David SchweikertEli CraneKelly Cooper
CD 5CD 6CD 8
Andy BiggsJuan CiscomaniDebbie Lesko
  
CD 9
Paul Gosar

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.

Senator Sinema Should Stand with the People of Arizona and Reject the Inflation Reduction Act

Senator Sinema Should Stand with the People of Arizona and Reject the Inflation Reduction Act

This week could be the most consequential of Senator Kyrsten Sinema’s tenure in Congress.

Right now, she faces immense pressure from both sides to either accept or reject the recent deal Senator Joe Manchin and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer cobbled together. The so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” is the latest iteration of the long-sought-after “Build Back Better” plan that President Joe Biden touted more than a year ago.

While the name sounds like a good idea, it’s a complete disaster. The bill itself continues to push Green New Deal policies that will lead to even higher prices at the gas station and grocery store. That’s not exactly helping with the inflation reduction that they’re hyping.

In addition, it seeks to expand government-run health plans, allow the government to negotiate the cost of drugs, and create a slush fund for the IRS that would allow them to add 87,000 new agents. But perhaps worst of all, the bill is a significant tax increase.

The Joint Committee on Taxation scores the bill as raising taxes on nearly every American worker. This breaks President Biden’s promise that no family earning less than $400,000 would pay more in taxes. On top of that, it raises more than $16 billion from those earning less than $200,000 and another $14 billion on those earning between $200,000 and $500,000.

And they’re trying to do all of this in the midst of a recession!

Naturally, progressives are privately complaining that the bill does not go far enough in advancing their radical agenda, especially as it relates to climate change. But they are happy to have something. Now, that has put the pressure on Sinema to support the deal. And it’s increasing by the minute.

Since being elected, Sinema has remained largely independent on budget and tax issues, including on the Build Back Broke agenda pushed by Biden. And while she has frustrated both Republicans and Democrats, she’s mostly drawn the ire of leftist progressives who have been calling on her to be primaried in 2024.

But if Sinema wants to keep her seat, she should focus on siding with the people of Arizona on these issues. So, what do they say?

Recent polling shows that a majority of Arizona voters would prefer that Sinema reject the Manchin-Schumer package. 53% say she should vote no on the bill while 50% of voters say they would be less likely to vote for her if she supports the deal.

At a time when 58% of Arizonans believe that inflation is the worst in their lifetimes—and a whopping 63% of Arizona voters say they oppose raising taxes in a recession—now is not the time to raise taxes.

But it’s not just the taxes that the people of Arizona are concerned about.

They don’t want the government negotiating the cost of drugs. Only 14% of voters support this idea while 52% prefer point of sale discounts for seniors buying prescription drugs. And who can blame them? They can clearly see who stands to benefit from such a negotiation, and they know it’s not the people.

Now, this whole entire bill may rest on the shoulders of Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema. Will she continue to represent Arizona voters? Or will she cave to the progressive special interests in Washington, D.C.? If she wants to see her tenure extended in 2024, Sinema should remember who she signed up to stand for.

Tell Your US Senators to Vote NO on the Inflation Reducation Act

Renaming the Build Back Broke bill the “Inflation Reduction Act” won’t change the fact that it’s a massive tax and spend agenda that will make our economy worse, not better.

Now it’s time to tell your US Senators, Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, to oppose this deal. Gas prices are high, inflation is soaring, and Arizona families and small businesses are struggling. We can’t afford more DC spending, tax hikes, corporate welfare, and an IRS that will target hardworking Arizonans. Tell your US Senators to vote NO on the “Inflation Reduction Act!”

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Full List of Endorsements to Date for the 2022 Election

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Full List of Endorsements to Date for the 2022 Election

Over the past two months, the Arizona Free Enterprise Club has announced its candidate endorsements for the 2022 election.

These candidates represent individuals that share our values and commitment to a free and prosperous Arizona. Club President Scot Mussi stated, “It is critical that Arizona elects leaders and policymakers who are able to articulate and stand up for individual liberties, free market policies, and conservative values. We believe that these candidates are up to the challenge.”

Below is a summary of the candidates we have endorsed to date.

Arizona State Legislature

LD 1LD 2LD 3
Senate: Steve ZippermanHouse: Pierce WaychoffHouse: Joseph Chaplik
House: Judy BurgesHouse: Christian Lamar
   
LD 4LD 7LD 9
Senate: Nancy BartoHouse: John FillmoreSenate: Rob Scantlebury
House: Vera GebranHouse: David MarshallHouse: Kathy Pearce
House: Maria Syms House: Mary Ann Mendoza 

LD 10LD 12LD 13
Senate: David FarnsworthSenate: Suzanne SharerSenate: JD Mesnard
House: Barbara ParkerHouse: Julie Willoughby
House: Justin Heap  

LD14LD 15LD 16
Senate: Warren PetersenSenate: Jake HoffmanHouse: Rob Hudelson
House: Travis GranthamHouse: Jacqueline Parker 
House: Laurin HendrixHouse: Neal Carter 
  
LD 17 LD 19 LD 23
House: Cory McGarrHouse: Gail GriffinSenate: Gary Snyder
House: Rachel JonesHouse: Lupe DiazHouse: Michele Pena (Write-in)

LD 25LD 27LD 28
House: Michael CarboneSenate: Anthony KernHouse: Beverly Pingerelli
House: Tim DunnHouse: Ben TomaHouse: Susan Black

LD 29LD 30
Senate: Janae ShampHouse: Leo Biasiucci
House: Steve Montenegro
House: Austin Smith

Local City and Town Council

ChandlerPaysonFountain Hills
Darla GonzalezTom Morrissey (Mayor)Brenda Kalivianakis
Farhana Shifa Allen Skillicorn
  Hannah Toth

PeoriaGilbertQueen Creek
Jason Beck (Mayor)Jim TorgesonTravis Padilla
Mario Chicas
 Bobbi Buchli 

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.