Katie Hobbs’ “Energy Promise” to Arizona Ratepayers: Higher Costs, More Subsidies  

Last year, Katie Hobbs, by executive order, established a “task force” headed by her Office of “Sustainability” to develop a report on energy affordability and reliability. This month, her task force submitted their plan which would do the opposite of that: make energy more expensive and less reliable. This shouldn’t come as a surprise considering the “task force” called by Hobbs is made up of solar special interests, environmental activists, her own agencies, and utilities that have all committed to going Net Zero anyway.  

Instead of reading 81 pages that brings nothing new to the table, the only questions that need to be asked (and answered) about the report are below.  

Does it call for new natural gas generation? Not really.  

Does it call on utilities to keep our coal plants open? No, they want to shut them down and “repower” them to “clean” energy.  

Does it pave the way for new nuclear? Not until the mid-2040s, at the earliest. 

What, then, does it advocate doing? Subsize special interests by blanketing state trust land and government buildings with even more solar, wind, and battery storage. The very thing causing utility rates to increase and leading to blackouts.  

Ironically, they recognize that the vast majority of new generation being built in the state right now – 82% of it according to the report – is already coming from solar, wind, and battery storage, while conveniently ignoring that at the same time both of the largest investor owned, monopoly utilities – APS and TEP – are currently seeking double digit rate hikes. And these rate hikes aren’t the first. Since Hobbs has taken office, the cost of electricity for residential ratepayers has gone from 12.63 cents per KWh to 16.03 cents. For someone using 1,000KWhs a month, that’s a $34 per month increase, or 27%. Under her plan, that will go far higher. 

Blame Trump 

Instead of acknowledging this, the report blames President Trump, who has been working to unleash energy across the country, for slashing the trillions in subsidies for solar, wind, and battery storage from the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” from the Biden Administration. They also blame Secretary Burgum for protecting federal lands from being carpeted with unreliable solar and wind farms. But electricity rates were increasing before Trump took office and Burgum was named Secretary of the Interior, precisely because of what they halted. We have more paper capacity than ever before, but costs are skyrocketing and reliability is declining because most of the new generation is coming from intermittent solar and wind.   

It should surprise no one, that even with taxpayer subsidies, the more solar, wind, and battery storage a utility puts on their grid, the higher costs are for ratepayers.  

Replace Coal with Solar and Battery Storage 

Instead of keeping our remaining coal plants online, as President Trump has called for, the report argues we should instead “repower” them with solar plus battery storage. Not only is it foolish on its face to replace a reliable source of energy with an intermittent source, it costs a lot more too. TEP even admitted so. In deciding to convert one of their existing coal plants to natural gas at a cost of $170 million, they argued that converting it to solar and battery storage would cost 27 times that, or $4.5 Billion. 

Competition? Only if Monopoly Utilities Benefit 

The only “solution” identified in the report that could actually help bring more capacity on the grid and shield ratepayers from increased costs from the massive energy demands of new large load customers, like data centers, is a “BYOC” or Bring Your Own Capacity approach where these customers self-generate their own power. But even here, the report doesn’t call for opening up the state for data centers to easily build their own power plants. No, for Hobbs it must be done in a way that benefits monopoly utilities. And, it must come with “sustainability” mandates on those data centers, which would cause prices to soar even higher. We ran a bill to streamline the process for data centers to bring their own power, likely to be natural gas, but the very utilities Hobbs is deferential to killed that bill at every step of the process. 

The Hobbs Energy Promise? Higher Costs, Subsidized by Taxpayers 

This is really just a political report, and if its recommendations were implemented, it would actually only increase the cost of electricity for Arizonans. We have seen the result of spamming the grid with renewables. 20 years after Kris Mayes spearheaded the effort to mandate 15% renewable energy, Arizonans have paid more than $3 billion for it. The Corporation Commission itself found that a renewable mandate would cost ratepayers $6 Billion. Our analysis of APS’ resource plan to go 100% renewable by 2050 found that it would cost ratepayers at least $42.7 billion through 2038, raising residential ratepayers’ bills by $100 a month.  

So, what is Hobbs’ actual plan to lower the cost of electricity for Arizonans? Her budget proposal this year included a tax hike to pay for a fund that would subsidize the utility bills of a few ratepayers across the state. In other words, she has done nothing in her 4 years as Governor to actually lower the costs of electricity and seemingly has no problem with our utilities getting their double-digit rate hikes. Instead, she wants to use taxpayer dollars to subsidize those rate hikes. Under her plan, utilities get their rate hikes, and ratepayers pay doubly for it – in higher rates and taxes.  

The Real Energy Promise that Delivers Affordability and Reliability to Customers 

The path for lower utility bills is not complicated. Stop shutting down coal. Meet new demand with more natural gas. Allow data centers to build their own power, on their own dime. Pave the way for more nuclear power within the next decade. Stop wasting money on unreliable solar, wind, and battery storage. If Hobbs was interested in delivering affordability and reliability to Arizona ratepayers, this is what a real Energy Promise would actually look like.  

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.

Cities Penalize Retailers for their Own Stolen Property

While some legislators are working to keep California-style policies out of Arizona, corrupt municipal leaders in cities such as Phoenix and Tucson clearly haven’t gotten the memo. For years, these cities have subjected businesses to an unfair fee for their own shopping carts being stolen. Rather than targeting theft, homelessness, or law enforcement strategies, this policy shifts blame onto retailers, effectively punishing the victims. A classic California-esque idea infecting our Arizona cities. 

Representative Nick Kupper introduced HB2460 this legislative session to combat this insanity and introduce some common sense. This bill prevents local governments from fining retailers over abandoned movable property, such as shopping carts and handheld baskets. Retailers already lose money from cart theft; charging them to reclaim their own stolen property is ridiculous. 

This type of policy is the definition of “California-ing Arizona.” California has regulated abandoned shopping carts for decades, with state law dating back to 1992 authorizing cities to penalize retailers when carts are not retrieved from public spaces. Tucson and Phoenix are now following in those footsteps. Arizona law ARS 44-1799.33 already establishes procedures for dealing with abandoned shopping carts, including notice to the owner, impoundment, cost recovery, and eventual disposal if the cart is not retrieved, without automatically penalizing retailers. 

Arizona should be a state that prioritizes accountability and property rights, but these cities seem intent on breaking that mold.  

Tucson started back in 2013 when the city council approved an ordinance requiring retailers to retrieve abandoned shopping carts that end up off of their property. If they fail to pick up a cart within three days after notification, the city impounds it and charges the retailer a $30 retrieval fee. After 30 days, the fee is automatically added to the company’s water bill, and the cart is either sold or discarded. Retailers bear the burden after their property has already been stolen. 

Phoenix has an even longer history of penalizing retailers through its Abandoned Shopping Cart Retrieval Program, first authorized as a pilot in 2005 and officially established in 2007. The program charges retailers a fee when city crews collect carts found off-site. Over the years, the fees have increased from $20 in 2007 to $50 by 2017, supposedly to “incentivize better management” of their property. Just this year, the city expanded its approach with a new ordinance requiring annual retailer certification, management plans, and higher penalties for non-compliance.  

While Phoenix and Tucson have some of the longest histories with this bad policy, other Arizona cities including Avondale (2020), Glendale (2023), Maricopa (2022), and Peoria (2008) have adopted similar shopping cart ordinances. Whether through retrieval fees, regulatory requirements, or mandated anti-theft measures, the trend reflects a growing statewide shift toward placing increased responsibility on retailers for cart loss and abandonment. 

Cities defend these policies by arguing that abandoned shopping carts impose public costs: blocked sidewalks, poor aesthetics, and cleanup time. Framing the policy as cost recovery rather than punishment, they claim retailers are best positioned to prevent loss through management systems or retrieval services.  

During the committee hearing on HB2460, a representative of the City of Phoenix even argued that enforcing the law against thieves would be problematic because retailers would be prosecuting their customers. Last I checked, people who steal carts are not law-abiding citizens merely buying groceries, they’re criminals. In that same discussion, a Democrat lawmaker claimed that preventing cities from imposing these fines would be government overreach. It truly feels like we are living in an upside-down world. 

But there is no good rationale for these ordinances. If theft is the problem, why not prioritize enforcement and deterrence? Shifting the burden onto retailers normalizes the crime and encourages continued bad behavior. Why would it ever stop if the guilty never face repercussions? 

These unjust ordinances are the gateway to further punishment of the innocent while the guilty walk free. It starts with shopping carts, then Arizona will go full-blown California and allow squatters to take over homes and punish the rightful property owners.  

HB2460 is necessary to protect retailers from being fined for retrieving their own stolen property. This shouldn’t even be a debate. In America, your property is yours, and those who steal it should face consequences, not the victims of the theft. That is justice. The bill passed the Arizona House in late February on a party-line vote and now heads to the Senate. We encourage the Senate and the governor to move quickly to pass and sign the measure to reaffirm basic property rights and ensure businesses are not punished for crimes committed by others and reject the creeping wave of California-style policies before they take deeper root in our state. 

Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network

Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!

Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.