by admin | May 25, 2023 | News and Updates, Tax
Last week, Tucson residents exercised common sense by overwhelmingly rejecting Prop 412 in a special election. And whether you live in the city or not, this is a significant win for our future.
Disguised as a new agreement between the City of Tucson and Tucson Electric Power (TEP) to renew the Franchise Agreement for another 25 years using the current 2.25% fee, the proposal included a number of Green New Deal pet projects. Had it passed, it would have added a 0.75% “Community Resilience Fee” to fund the costs associated with building underground transmission facilities—and “projects that support the City’s implementation of the City’s approved Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.”
That would have meant:
-
- Lengthy construction projects removing driving lanes from roads (Road Diets)
- Permanently inhibiting access to small businesses
- Reducing personal vehicles by 40% by 2050
- Establishing Tucson as a 15-minute city with local travel restrictions removing personal choice
Now, the citizens of Tucson have spoken. And it’s clear that they don’t want Green New Deal mandates that take money from their wallet and freedom from their lives.
But make no mistake about it. TEP and its leftist ally Mayor Regina Romero are committed to their “climate change” agenda. Following the resounding defeat of Prop 412, TEP put out a statement that it still plans to move forward on adopting the Green New Deal by phasing out fossil fuels. This is the same utility company that is currently seeking a 12% rate hike from the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) before the end of the year! They have a monopoly and are assuming that the ACC will simply rubber stamp whatever rate hike they request.
That’s why it also shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that right before the defeat of Prop 412, the Tucson City Council voted to make public transit free indefinitely despite not having funding secured beyond December. That’s right, after three years of not charging for transportation services, the government failed to listen to the people again.
Community members have complained that this three-year experiment has led to a rise in crime and public nuisances. Bus driver unions have complained that free busing threatens public safety and forces drivers to act as transit police. And other public safety activists have claimed that free busing facilitates drug sales, trafficking, and even usage.
But liberals like Mayor Romero and other members of the Tucson City Council just don’t care. The Left is committed to its agenda, but when you stay informed, when you make passionate arguments based on facts, and when you hit the streets and fight back, you can defeat them. Prop 412 is the perfect example of that. Now, we need to be prepared for the next battle.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
by admin | Apr 28, 2023 | News and Updates, Tax
A special election is taking place right now in Tucson, and even if you’re not from the city, you should pay attention. At first glance, Prop 412 appears to be nothing more than a new agreement between the City of Tucson and Tucson Electric Power (TEP) to renew the Franchise Agreement for another 25 years using the current 2.25% fee. But just like anything government bureaucrats put out there nowadays, you need to keep reading.
Along with the renewed agreement, Prop 412 would add a 0.75% “Community Resilience Fee” to fund the costs associated with building underground transmission facilities—and projects that support the City’s implementation of its Climate Action Plan. Ahhh, there it is. The agenda behind Prop 412 finally comes out. This isn’t about renewing a franchise agreement. It’s about forcing hardworking taxpayers to start funding the estimated $326 million it’s going to need to address Mayor Regina Romero’s so-called “climate emergency.”
According to TEP, it plans to use this “Resiliency” Slush Fund to:
-
- decarbonize city-owned and operated buildings and facilities.
- promote distributed energy resources such as rooftop solar to provide local renewable energy and enhance energy resilience.
- pursue additional local sources of renewable energy, including resource recovery and heat exchange.
- promote electric vehicles via charging infrastructure expansion.
- transition public agency fleets to zero-emission and net-zero-emission vehicles.
- establish accessible resilience hubs across all City Wards to provide information and resources related to climate preparedness and response.
- bolster City-owned and community-wide heat mitigation resources to reduce urban heat island effect and protect vulnerable individuals and communities.
- deploy and maintain equitable nature-based solutions that reduce or sequester emissions, improve ecosystem health, and bolster climate resilience.
- bolster community and regional networks to improve community-wide emergency response and resource-sharing.
That’s right. It’s just another long list of Green New Deal pet projects all at the expense of taxpayers who are already overburdened by Bidenflation and exorbitant gas prices.
But there has to be some kind of benefit, right? Nope.
If Prop 412 passes, Tucson residents can expect to be on road diets through lengthy construction projects that remove driving lanes from roads. This will cause small businesses—many of which are still recovering from ill-advised COVID shutdowns—to suffer as lane reductions create a permanent inconvenience for customers. On top of that, it will reduce personal vehicles by 40% by 2050, and ultimately lead to what Mayor Romero really wants: establishing Tucson as a 15-minute city with local travel restrictions that remove personal choice.
Even if you don’t live in Tucson, that last one should concern you. Liberals around the world are pushing the 15-minute city concept more and more. In Barcelona, the city is limiting personal car vehicles only to residents or delivery services. And speed limits are a maximum of 6 miles per hour. In Oxford in the UK, the government has adopted an $86 fee for driving past the 15-minute filter in a personal vehicle.
But perhaps the biggest question of all is why does TEP even need more taxpayer dollars to begin with? Its reported profits from the last three years are:
-
- 2020 – $191 million
- 2021 – $201 million
- 2022 – $217 million
In addition to these profits and the 0.75% Community Resilience Fee, TEP has already requested that the Arizona Corporation Commission approve a 12% rate increase before the end of the year. That would bring the total average impact between Prop 412 and the proposed rate increases to be about $180 per year for customers. This is outrageous! TEP and the City of Tucson don’t care about residents. They are just looking for another money grab to push a Green New Deal agenda that restricts freedom with no real positive impact on the environment. Now, it’s up to the citizens of Tucson to push back and vote NO on Prop 412.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
by admin | Mar 8, 2023 | News and Updates, Tax
Today, the Arizona Free Enterprise Club released a new study evaluating the project investments proposed in the Maricopa County Association of Governments (MAG) “2050 Momentum Plan” funded through a half-cent Proposition 400 sales tax extension.
In his analysis, transportation scholar Randal O’Toole determined that MAG failed to employ the most basic “rational planning process” which requires developing a wide range of alternatives, evaluating those alternatives, and monitoring their implementation. This abdication of the rational planning process is even more confounding post-COVID pandemic which radically changed travel behaviors, and highlights that MAG was more interested in pushing an agenda than devising transportation policies that could respond to real-world problems and withstand objective scrutiny.
O’Toole investigated claims that MAG’s Plan would alleviate congestion, improve air quality, enhance social equity, and improve safety, all of which either fall short, are unsubstantiated with evidence, or in fact worsen. Notably, the study reveals:
-
- The Plan provides no explanation for the steady decline in transit ridership in Maricopa County under the existing regional transportation tax. In particular, transit ridership declined from 2009 to 2019 despite population increasing by over one million residents in the region.
- The Plan fails to recognize the significant shift in travel behavior post COVID-19 (more telecommuting, less rush hour commuting) which further decimated transit ridership, with 2022 boardings being only 55% of what it was in 2019.
- MAG fails to disclose any of the computations used to determine outcomes in the Plan. Key information such as projections for future transit ridership, assumptions used for future changes in traffic congestion and travel behavior, or calculations on how safety will be improved have been withheld from the public.
- The Plan inequitably allocates 40 percent of the tax revenue to transit despite transit carrying less than 1 percent of the region’s passenger miles and zero miles of freight.
- $2.3B in the Plan funds “active transportation” or non-vehicular travel as well as “transportation demand management” projects, all of which are meant to reduce single-occupancy vehicular travel. This includes 21 miles of bicycle lanes on minor arterials and collectors which will most likely reduce capacity and increase congestion for auto traffic.
- The Plan lacks any coherent or substantiated strategy to reduce congestion in the region despite congestion being the predominant concern of county travelers, costing them nearly $1,200 per auto commuter in 2019.
- Less than 2 percent of commuters who earn less than $25,000 a year take transit and a small fraction of the 2.5% of workers in households without a car in the region utilize transit. As such, the Plan neglects to help the vast majority of low-income commuters in the region who can access twice as many jobs in a 20-minute auto drive than in a 60-minute transit ride.
The data in this study should help inform lawmakers’ decisions regarding formulating transportation funding and policy in Maricopa County going forward. “The Prop 400 extension represents the largest piece of transportation policy lawmakers will consider in the next two decades,” stated Scot Mussi, President of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club. “It is critical that it is informed by the data of how people choose to travel in the region, not ideological agendas and pie-in-the-sky utopian ideas being imposed on taxpayers by bureaucrats.”
The full study can be accessed here.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
by admin | Mar 3, 2023 | Corporate Welfare, News and Updates, Tax
No one likes to pay taxes. So, understandably, businesses who can afford to hire lobbyists go to the state capitol every year to figure out how to pay less of them. Some of these large corporations have been so successful, they don’t pay any taxes at all.
Take, for example, the beneficiaries of the R&D tax credit program, which in Arizona is so generous, there is an almost $2 billion carryforward of accrued credits which can be applied for 10 years. This effectively means that there are too many credits and not enough tax liability to absorb them. How would you like the ability to not pay taxes for the next decade?
For “small” businesses with fewer than 150 employees, they are eligible for a “refund” of up to 75% of the excess credits, capped at $5M every year. There is a word for a business receiving a tax refund when you have zero tax liability—it is a subsidy. Any tax system that excludes some businesses from paying while making everyone else pick up the tab is dubious tax policy. But to then allow those same businesses to collect additional subsidies—paid for by all other taxpayers—is downright wrong. It is nothing more than government redistribution to the politically connected.
It is also likely unconstitutional. For good reason, the framers of Arizona’s Constitution were suspicious of corporate interests accruing political power that outsized average taxpayers, seizing preferential treatment for themselves at the expense of everyone else. As such, Article 9, Section 7 of the Constitution, also known as “The Gift Clause,” prohibits donations, grants, or subsidies from the government to corporate or private interests. A refundable tax credit is irrefutably a subsidy.
That has not stopped lawmakers and lobbyists from pushing this year’s expansion of the program through SB1562. This bill would expand the existing program for “small” firms receiving refundable credits from $5M to $10M a year and creates a new program that allows up to $50M a year in unused credits by larger companies to be converted $0.75 on the dollar (i.e. made refundable) for reinvestment.
This is a massive expansion in the refundability of the program and lays the groundwork for all $2 billion to be given away in subsidies to big businesses. And considering the state only generates $850M a year in corporate taxes, lawmakers should instead look to cut corporate income taxes across the board, rather than look to creative ways to hand out $2B in subsidies.
Proponents may argue that these aren’t really subsidies, as the money must be used for qualifying reinvestment projects and that taxpayers ultimately benefit because these projects are a public good because they must be used for “sustainability” or water-saving capital projects or for various workforce development projects or tuition reimbursement. Well, this is a stretch to say the least. What business wouldn’t want regular capital projects designed to save them money overall or training, education, and employee benefits such as tuition reimbursement defrayed? While schemes such as Bernie Sanders “free” tuition to attend woke universities, compliments of the taxpayers, are wildly unpopular with the general public, SB1562 is a creative repackaging. The only hook is, to have your tuition footed by taxpayers, you have to work for a politically connected corporation.
In reality, there isn’t a difference to a business in giving them a bag of cash or reimbursing their normal business costs—it all serves their bottom line. Unfortunately for every other taxpayer, it comes out of their pocketbooks. Despite the army of lobbyists hired to push for SB1562, we hope taxpayers ultimately win the battle this year to expand corporate welfare at the legislature.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
by admin | Mar 2, 2023 | News and Updates, Tax
Who wouldn’t want more money in their pocket? As Bidenflation continues to crush the American people—and in particular the people of Arizona—our elected leaders should be looking for every way possible to provide relief.
Just look at the anti-tax mood among Arizona voters this past November. They rejected Prop 310, which would have increased the statewide sales tax by 0.1% to fund fire districts throughout Arizona. They voted down ill-conceived transportation taxes in Pinal County and Kingman. And they passed Prop 132 to protect against future tax increases. That should be proof enough that Arizonans want to ensure that their hard-earned dollars stay in their wallets. Now, a new bill recently passed by the Arizona Senate would do just that.
Sponsored by Republican Senator J.D. Mesnard, SB1577 would require the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to examine total revenue coming into the state. If they determine that there will be an ongoing budget surplus, the Arizona Department of Revenue will automatically apply half of the surplus toward a reduction in the individual income tax, which currently sits at a flat rate of 2.5%. And with Arizona currently sitting on a multi-billion dollar budget surplus, that means you would keep more of your money sooner rather than later.
Of course, Democrats and other liberal groups are up in arms. The Arizona Center for Empowerment (ACE)—a leftist 501(c)(3) that’s been known to manipulate the tax code—even referred to this bill as an economic attack on our communities in a tweet last month. You read that right. They believe that cutting taxes for every person in Arizona who earns an income is an attack.
Maybe someone should tell ACE that it’s not just the state of Arizona sitting on a pile of cash. Many of our cities and towns are too. And the real attack is continuing to take money from Arizona citizens while city, state, and local governments stockpile more, and more, and more. The fact is that this is a great bill for every citizen in our state and will give them much-needed relief in the midst of a worsening economy, rising inflation, and high gas prices under President Biden.
But perhaps the left’s greatest concern is that they may not be able to rely on Katie Hobbs’ active veto pen to stop this one. Because if Hobbs does decide to veto it, the Arizona Senate also passed SCR1035, a ballot measure that would give voters the opportunity to approve this same exact tax cut. And given the recent attitude of the majority of Arizonans to taxes, they would likely look quite favorably upon SCR1035.
As both these bills now await their fate in the Arizona House, Republicans should look to continue the momentum from passing the largest tax cut in state history last year. It’s time to pass SCR1035 and send SB1577 to Katie Hobbs’ desk. She has a 10-year history of screwing taxpayers. Let’s see if she’s willing to do it again.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
by admin | Dec 22, 2022 | News and Updates, Tax
Arizona taxpayers are tired. It’s bad enough that our state has been getting crushed by the highest inflation rate in the country, but during this past November’s election, the government tried to swoop in and take more of your hard-earned dollars out of your wallet. This time, Arizona voters said enough is enough. Not only did they reject several tax increases, but they ensured victory for one key protection against future tax increases.
Arizonans Reject Prop 310
Prop 310 aimed to increase the statewide sales tax by 0.1% to fund fire districts throughout Arizona, and its proponents used the oldest trick in the book. Just like we’ve seen with past education or transportation tax increases, they tried to convince voters that Prop 310 would only cost them a penny when they buy coffee or a dime when they buy dinner.
But Arizona voters saw through it—with 53% of the people rejecting the tax.
The fact is that Prop 310 would have been a massive tax increase. The Commonsense Institute estimated that it would have cost taxpayers $5.5 billion over the next 20 years while resulting in the loss of thousands of jobs. But the problem with Prop 310 wasn’t just that it was bad tax policy, it was lazy legislating. Arizona currently has a $5 billion surplus and will likely have another one in the coming year, thanks to prior tax cuts. Saying no to this tax hike on the ballot doesn’t mean that the people of Arizona said no to public safety. It just means that our state’s lawmakers need to do their jobs and create a plan that doesn’t burden taxpayers further.
Transportation Taxes Fail in Pinal County and Kingman
Earlier this year, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled against a Pinal County transportation tax scheme in a lawsuit brought by the Goldwater Institute. So, how did the county respond? It pushed for Prop 469 on the ballot—a half-cent sales tax that the county claimed would be used for a long list of transportation projects and programs through the next 20 years.
But Pinal County voters have a good memory, and they’re tired of the government wasting their hard-earned dollars or trying to illegally take more money from them. So, they voted down this ill-conceived tax increase. And they’re not the only ones who rejected a transportation tax in this November’s election. Kingman residents joined them by saying no to Prop 415—a 0.56% sales tax increase for single items below $10,000 to fund residential street repair and maintenance.
The Success of Prop 132 Will Protect Against Future Tax Increases
As important as the rejection of these tax increases was, it is the success of Prop 132 that gives taxpayers the most hope for the future. With its passing, this constitutional amendment will require a 60 percent majority vote of the people on any ballot measure that seeks to raise your taxes.
Not only does this super majority reflect the current process for tax increases in the state legislature, but it will put a check on out-of-state special interests that want to increase Arizona’s taxes to fund their schemes. Now, thanks to Prop 132, if we’re going to ask the people of Arizona to part with more of their paycheck, it will need to be for something that has broad agreement from every part of the state. And that is critical because tax increases should never be taken lightly—especially in the midst of a worsening economy, rising inflation, and high gas prices. The people of Arizona recognized this in November’s election, and now we can all truly enjoy massive tax cuts starting in 2023.
Help Protect Freedom in Arizona by Joining Our Grassroots Network
Arizona needs to have a unified voice promoting economic freedom and prosperity, and the Free Enterprise Club is committed to making that happen. But we can’t do it alone. We need YOU!
Join our FREE Grassroots Action List to stay up to date on the latest battles against big government and how YOU can help influence crucial bills at the Arizona State Legislature.
Recent Comments