by admin | Jul 2, 2019 | Elections, News and Updates
The City of Phoenix has been
living beyond their means for way too long.
Their fiscal irresponsibility has led to a crushing $5.7 Billion in unfunded
pension debt and no real plan on how to pay it off or honor their commitments
to current or future retirees.
The City of Phoenix Employees’
Retirement System (COPERS), the retirement plan for general employees excluding
sworn police and fire personnel, is woefully underfunded. The City contributed less than $30M a year to
COPERS in the early 2000’s; this is expected to balloon to over $180M by next
year. Yet these payments still won’t put a dent in
the mountain of debt. As of only two
years ago, the fund was only 57 percent funded – having $2.35B in assets to
cover $4.13B in liabilities.
Despite several propositions
passing in the past to right the ship – Phoenix is still severely
underwater. That is because the city has
a major spending problem. And instead of
addressing this problem, politicians have continued to kick the can down the
road, using accounting tricks and other sneaky maneuvers to avoid addressing
the crisis.
That is why a group of citizens
and Councilman Sal DiCiccio has pushed to get Prop 106 on the August 27th
ballot. If approved by voters, this measure will end the budget gimmicks,
require honest accounting of pension costs and prioritize paying down the debt
of the pension system. The measure will also prohibit the city’s budget from outpacing
inflation plus population and put a cap on spending until pension liabilities
are funded at 90 percent.
This will put the city’s
pension system on a sustainable path and ensure that pension obligations are
met.
Prop 106 is a responsible
plan for a growing problem that will benefit both taxpayers and retirees. We encourage
Phoenix citizens to Vote Yes on Prop 106.
by admin | Jun 18, 2019 | Misc, News and Updates
Even with a billion-dollar
budget surplus and record state revenues, Democrats in the Arizona
legislature were united in their cause to raise taxes and fees on hardworking families.
How big was their tax hike
push? Every Democrat in the State Senate and House voted to:
In total, the Democrat tax
hike package would have cost taxpayers over $500 million dollars.
Fortunately, Republicans
were successful in fending off the Democrat tax hike push by repealing the car registration
fee and returning the additional tax revenue generated from tax conformity and
online sales back to taxpayers.
Though taxpayers dodged a
bullet, it does not appear the Democrats have been deterred from their
relentless push to take more of their money. This is a fact that every voter
should consider heading into the 2020 election.
by admin | Jun 6, 2019 | Misc, News and Updates
For years city politicians,
developers and contractors have misled voters on the waste and damage created
by the multi-billion-dollar expansion of light rail. They have concealed the
true cost of light rail from voters in previous transportation measures by
tying light rail to street improvements and other popular transit projects,
hoping that the facts would not be exposed until it is too late.
Currently 40% of Phoenix’s
transportation tax revenue is dedicated to light rail, even though only 1% of
Phoenix residents regularly use the system. And despite billions
being spent on promoting and expanding light rail, ridership is in rapid
decline. Last year alone 800,000 fewer people used light rail, and there will
be fewer riders using the system this year.
The City’s own transportation
department has determined that over 70% of Phoenix roads are in substandard
condition and will require billions to repair. This street maintenance deficit
can be paid for with the dollars freed up by ending the expansion of light
rail.
The billions saved by stopping
the expansion of light rail could be used to fix city streets and sidewalks,
expand bus and dial-a-ride service, improve lighting and get Phoenix’s
transportation system on the right path.
There are much better alternatives than light rail, yet Phoenix leaders seem determined to throw more money at a boondoggle that is costly, inefficient, and drains the city’s transportation budget. Phoenix taxpayers deserve better than this.
by admin | Jun 4, 2019 | Free Market, News and Updates
Phoenix, AZ (June
4th)–Today the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, in collaboration with the Economic
Research Center at The Buckeye Institute, released “It Ain’t Easy Being Green: A
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Electric Vehicles in Arizona.” The paper is a comprehensive study
examining the pros and cons of electric vehicle (EV) subsidies in Arizona and
whether these inducements are worth the cost to taxpayers and utility ratepayers.
The
analysis was conducted in response to several proposals being considered by
policymakers in Arizona to encourage more drivers to purchase EVs, including a current proposal at the Arizona Corporation
Commission to require utility companies build EV charging stations, with the
cost of these stations being passed along to all ratepayers through higher
utility rates.
The
study reveals that EVs are already heavily subsidized by taxpayers in Arizona
and that creating a new mandate for the construction of charging stations would
only exacerbate the status quo, distort the market for EV technology and redistribute
wealth to a few affluent EV car owners at the expense of every electricity user
in the state.
“After a comprehensive analysis, our research
clearly shows that—in an effort to encourage the purchase of more electric
cars—Arizonans are being over taxed to subsidize wealthy owners of electric
cars, which disproportionately hurts those who can’t afford to purchase a new
electric car. Taxpayers are seeing
little return on these subsidies, paying on average more
than $6,000 more per electric car on the road than they are realizing
in benefits over the course of five years,” said Andrew J. Kidd, Ph.D., an economist with the
Economic Research Center at The Buckeye Institute and one of the authors of “It
Ain’t Easy Being Green.” “Furthermore, if a new proposal by the
Arizona Corporation Commission is adopted, Arizonans will pay more on their
electric bills to subsidize the building of more electric charging
stations—even though there are currently 12 public chargers for every electric
car on the road in Arizona.”
Some of the other key
findings in the study include:
- A Charging Station
Mandate would act as a regressive tax on low and middle-income households to
benefit more affluent EV drivers.
- Over 83% of EV tax
credit subsidies went to households earning above $100,000. Conversely, less
than 1% of those subsidies were accessed by households below $50,000.
- In Arizona, EV car owners
pay on average $500 less each year than non-EV drivers for road maintenance.
“Mandating the construction of EV charging stations, paid for with an increase in utility rates, is both unnecessary and unfair,” said Scot Mussi, President of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club. “Taxpayers are already overpaying based on the benefits provided by Electric Vehicles. Instead of handing out another subsidy to EV drivers, policymakers should explore other options that avoid picking winners and losers among ratepayers.”
by admin | May 20, 2019 | News and Updates, Tax
As the Club has covered for
over a year, Arizona taxpayers are facing the largest income tax increase in
state history if a proper federal tax conformity plan is not adopted by the
legislature. The department of revenue estimates that the conformity tax
increase would be over $200 million dollars in the first year, with some
estimates as high as $300 million.
The good news is that
policymakers appear to be on the same page that any additional conformity
revenues must be given back. This is a big win for taxpayers. What remains an
open question is the manner in which the money is returned.
The second issue is just as
important as the first. Though a simple
approach on stopping the tax hike (such as cutting all the tax rates) could be
done, the Club has advocated that the conformity issue be used as an
opportunity to reform and simplify our income tax code.
Reforming Arizona’s income
tax code is long overdue, and if done right could be bring us closer to
neighboring states Utah and Colorado with a simple flat income tax. If we can’t
eliminate the tax, a simple/flatter system is the next best choice.
Unfortunately, most of the
discussions related to conform and reform have been behind closed doors in
budget meetings, with little input from the public. Though various components
have been leaked, it has been extremely difficult to determine which proposals
are best without reviewing the projected impact on taxpayers.
For example, adopting a
reform model that cuts taxes for some taxpayers while raising taxes on others
(picking winners and losers) would be suboptimal. The only way to figure this
out is through modeling from the Department of Revenue. Yet most of this data is only accessible to
lawmakers and the executive branch; it leaves interested observers and
stakeholders at a disadvantage on making an informed decision.
Without a front row seat to
the debate or access to modeling, the Club has been seeking out a reform plan
that both returns all of the money and holds taxpayers across all income ranges
harmless.
The
3 Bracket Solution
Last week a conform a reform
plan was released that appears to do the trick (The plan can be viewed by
clicking HERE).
Developed by Senate Finance
Chairman JD Mesnard, his 3-Bracket model would implement the following income
tax reforms:
- Offset the entire conformity income tax
increase and return the money to taxpayers.
- Provide an offset for additional tax revenue
generated by the proposed implementation of an online sales tax (a.k.a.
Wayfair) thereby preventing another tax increase.
- Collapse Arizona’s income tax brackets from 5
to 3
- Mirror Federal Tax Reform by doubling the
standard deduction for all taxpayers.
- Keep the medical deduction and add a new
charitable deduction.
- Implement a new child and new family tax
credit
Why the 3-bracket plan? This
is only plan so far released that will hold individual income taxpayers (which
include small businesses) harmless across all income thresholds and stops
multiple tax increases, saving taxpayers over $300 million per year. Other reform
plans, though well intentioned, appear to shift taxes across income levels that
would trigger a tax increase on thousands of Arizona families and small
businesses.
As structured, the 3-bracket
plan would provide taxpayers making $50k or less with a substantial income tax
cut. Taxpayers in this income group would see their tax bill slashed by an
average of 20 percent.
Finally, the 3-bracket
solution would simplify our tax code while flattening out the brackets.
Reducing the progressivity of our income tax code should be the cornerstone of
any reform package.
As the legislature
(hopefully) heads into the final stretch, it the Club’s hope that the 3-bracket
plan is seriously considered and adopted as the conform and reform solution in
the budget.
by admin | Apr 29, 2019 | News and Updates, Tax
The
Arizona Republican Party has decided to become the party of tax hikes. Yesterday,
party Chairwoman Kelli Ward announced that the GOP is officially backing an amendment to the
Arizona Constitution to impose a permanent $500 Million dollar sales tax
increase for education. This is both bad policy and bad politics that will
inflict irreparable harm on our state economy and sales tax code.
Arizona Doesn’t Need to Raise
Taxes
As
the Club has chronicled for months, there has been a steady drumbeat at the
legislature by political insiders to raise taxes for education. This is despite
the fact that Arizona is enjoying incredible economic growth and record state
revenues.
Since
the economic boom began two years ago, state revenues have increased by $1.7 Billion. By comparison, from FY 2009 to FY 2017 state
revenue grew by only $1.2 Billion. This rapid revenue growth wasn’t an
accident—it is a result of pro-growth reforms by a new administration in
Washington, Governor Doug Ducey and a conservative state legislature.
Thanks
to the surge in tax receipts, Arizona is in the process of implementing the
largest increase in K-12 spending in state history. Over a billion dollars has
been injected into schools for teacher pay increases, district additional assistance
restoration and new school construction.
Even
with this large increase in education spending, Arizona will have nearly a $1 billion dollar surplus for FY 2020. It proves that the problem
was a lack of taxpayers, not tax increases.
Amending Our Constitution to
Raise Taxes?
Even
if the State GOP believes that a tax hike is needed, the idea that it should be
referred to the voters as a constitutional amendment is simply reckless.
If
changes to our tax code are deemed necessary, the most sensible approach would
be to approve a tax hike through the normal legislative process. Like our
Federal Government, Arizona is a republic, which means taxing authority has
been vested with the legislature. It is their responsibility to determine the
appropriate levels of spending and taxation. Punting the issue to voters is
nothing more than a way for politicians to avoid accountability for their
actions.
But
even if it was determined that the issue must go to the ballot, then it should
be a statutory proposal similar to Proposition 301 that was approved nearly twenty years ago.
Instead, they want to declare that the state government has a constitutional
right to $500 million dollars in sales tax revenue.
Also
unclear is whether the language has been vetted to ensure that it won’t lead to
unintended consequences. Since this is a constitutional amendment, each word or
syllable could face significant judicial scrutiny.
One
such example is the provision to dedicate “twenty percent for maintaining an
in-state tuition rate” at our state universities. The drafters of SCR 1001
probably thought this was a politically clever maneuver since voters like the
idea of keeping in state tuition low (knowing full well that it is a
meaningless mandate).
What
is not considered is that “in-state” is not defined in the measure, meaning the
courts could decide how this applies to various populations, such as illegal
immigrants. The Free Enterprise Club does not have a position on the DACA
issue, but it is unclear whether the Arizona GOP considered such issues when
endorsing this proposal. Perhaps they trust that judges won’t expand the
meaning of new language being written into our constitution.
What about the Polling?
A
common response from the tax hike lobby is that voters overwhelmingly support
higher taxes for education. Periodically an education group will trot out a poll showing support for a tax increase, which
is then gleefully used by the political establishment to spook lawmakers into
believing that they need to get on the “right side” of the issue.
It
is true that most public opinion polls have voters saying they would be willing
to pay more in taxes for education. But what about the only poll that matters,
the one that occurs on election day when people actually vote? Are tax
increases passing at the rate that the polling indicates? Let’s take a look:
- At the
height of the Red4ED movement in AZ last year, there were several education
spending proposals for voters to consider. Most were in the form of bond
proposals for school districts. Virtually every bond question had organized
support and little opposition on the ballot. Plus, these measures can be sold
to voters as a way to get more money for schools “without raising taxes.” Yet nearly half of the education bonds on the ballot were
rejected by voters. If support for education funding was as high as the
so-called experts claim, they should have been approved at a 9-1 clip.
- In
2018 Colorado voters had their own version of ‘Invest in Ed’ income tax
proposal on the ballot in Initiative 73, a “soak the rich” measure that would have
raised taxes on the wealthy to put $1.6 billion into education. Supporters of
amendment 73 claimed that polling showed voters supported the proposal, and it
was heavily backed by the teacher’s union and education community. The measure
was overwhelmingly rejected by voters.
- Oregon
voters in 2016 had an opportunity to raise taxes on Corporations to pay for
early childhood development and K-12 education. Measure 97 was another “free lunch” education
spending plan rejected by voters by a wide margin 59-41.
- In
2016 Arizona voters had an opportunity to support more spending for education
with no tax increase under Proposition 123. The measure was backed by Governor
Ducey, most of the education community, the entire legislature, and faced no
real opposition while raising over $4 million dollars. The measure barely passed 51-49.
As
the evidence shows, when November rolls around and voters actually have to make
a decision, support for tax increases is much lower than what the polling
indicates.
Muddled Message Heading into
2020
Now
that the AZ GOP has joined the tax hike chorus, it is difficult to know what
the party will stand for heading into 2020. Two days ago the AZ GOP posted a tweet declaring that “Tax Cuts Work” and that Republicans
believe taxpayers should be able to keep more of their money. How they plan to reconcile their support for
the Trump tax cuts while pushing for tax hikes on the Arizona ballot should
make for some entertaining political gymnastics.
It
will also be interesting to see how various GOP leaders respond to the new
party platform. Governor Doug Ducey has been a consistent and vocal opponent to raising taxes, as well as a vast
majority of the Republican legislature who know and understand how tax
increases can derail our economic recovery. It is in their best interest to
hold firm against this disastrous proposal so voters know that there are at
least some elected officials that care about protecting their wallet.
The
only reason the Republican Party exists is to help get people elected. By
declaring they support SCR 1001, they are sending the message that the only way
Republicans can win in 2020 is if they support a massive tax hike at the
ballot. We wish them luck on their bold new strategy to try to tax Arizona into
prosperity.
Recent Comments